70 years later, former Elliot School classmates reunite, tie the knot
It has been more than 70 years since Mary Ward and Ed Kinter were first sweet on each other, and they've found that it's never too late to tie the knot.
“We thought of getting married but never did,” said Ward, 85, of Butler Township.
Kinter and Ward expected about 200 guests for their wedding Saturday at the Presbyterian Church of Portersville.
“We love each other and want to be together. Our children are very excited by this,” said Kinter, of Portersville, who is buying a home in Butler Township where the couple will live.
Kinter and Ward met as children at a one-room school house on the site of what's now the Clearview Mall. During World War II, when she was still in high school and he was a Merchant Marine, they dated, but Ward's mother advised against marriage.
“He drank. He smoked. He was a sailor,” she said.
“I was a drinking, carousing, cussing sailor,” Kinter said. “She was a Christian lady who had to throw me under the bus.”
They married others. Ward's husband of 63 years, James Ward, passed away in 2009. Kinter's wife of 53 years, Jennie Kinter, died in 2007.
The first time they saw one another after their breakup was at a school reunion in the 1990s. Their friendship renewed after Ward's sister died in 2009, and Kinter called to express condolences.
Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.