Share This Page

Jury commissioner posts in county not restored

| Saturday, July 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Two Butler County commissioners are refusing to reinstate the two elected positions responsible for pulling together lists of prospective jurors, and the president of a state organization said a lawsuit is possible.

Butler County commissioners Bill McCarrier and Dale Pinkerton announced Wednesday they won't reverse their decision to abolish the two jury commissioner posts.

Larry A. Thompson, former county jury commissioner and president of the state jury commissioner association, said his organization and Jury Commissioners Clinton A. Bonetti and Jon Galante could sue for their reinstatement.

Gov. Tom Corbett signed legislation in May allowing counties to eliminate the position. The association has already appealed the legality of the bill in state Commonwealth Court.

Thompson maintains that eliminating the positions unfairly interfered with May's primary election, when Bonetti and Galante won nominations from the respective parties.

Jury commissioners help create jury pools for trials.

McCarrier and Pinkerton voted on May 23 to abolish the positions. The decision would deny Bonetti, a Democrat, and Galante, a Republican, both of Butler Township, a chance at re-election.

Their work would be done by the county's court administration office instead.

Commissioner James Eckstein supports keeping the jury commissioners.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.