Outgoing Mars Area superintendent earns leadership recognition
The retiring superintendent of the Mars Area School District will receive a top award from the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators.
The group will give William Pettigrew the Leadership in Public Education award, which the association says “demonstrates a commitment to school administration as a profession, to public education and to colleagues.”
“I am greatly honored that the association would recognize me,” Pettigrew, 64, said. “There are a lot of fine superintendents out there.”
Pettigrew will retire in December, having served in the post since 1987. He has nearly 44 years of experience in education, also serving as superintendent and assistant superintendent in the Penncrest School District, elementary school principal in Shippensburg Area School District and Tussey Mountain School District, and as an elementary teacher in Hempfield Area School District.
“Dr. Pettigrew is a well-respected and outstanding leader in education in Pennsylvania, said Frank Galicki, superintendent of the Dallas School District and past association president, who nominated Pettigrew for the award. “He respects other opinions and always speaks directly to the issue at hand.”
Pettigrew will receive the award Oct. 17 at the Pennsylvania School Board Association's school leadership conference in Hershey.
As part of the award, Pettigrew will select a Mars high school student to receive a one-time $1,000 scholarship. Pettigrew said he'll consult with guidance counselors to select a winner.
Earlier, Pettigrew was named 2013 Pennsylvania Rural Educator of the Year by the Pennsylvania Association of Rural & Small Schools.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.