Haine Middle School to have new principal
The Seneca Valley School Board has hired an educator from the Montour School District to take over as principal of Haine Middle School.
Daniel DiDesiderio, principal at J.W. Burkett Elementary School, said he hopes to bring strategies with him that worked at J.W. Burkett. Officials at Burkett worked on staff development that helped improve standardized test scores, he said.
“We raised PSSA scores very significantly at Montour,” he said. “I hope to infuse some of the ideas that have been successful here into that middle school setting. Seneca Valley, and especially Haine Middle School, is the perfect canvas. You have such great community support and resources. You can go into it and make it the very best.”
The board hired DiDesidero at its Oct. 7 meeting, Seneca spokeswoman Linda Andreassi said in a statement. He replaces Steven Smith, who took a principal's position with the Pine-Richland School District.
DiDesiderio said it will be hard to walk away from Burkett, but he is excited to take advantage of all that Seneca Valley has to offer.
“Seneca Valley has a great reputation for being innovative and progressive,” DiDesiderio said. “It had a great appeal, there's a highly functioning team there.”
DiDesiderio earned a bachelor of arts degree in music education, a master's in school administration and obtained his superintendent's letter of eligibility from Westminster College, Andreassi said. He hopes to complete his doctor of education degree in educational leadership and management from Capella University in May 2014.
There's no word yet on an official start date, but DiDesiderio said he probably will start at Haine some time in the next few weeks.
Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.