Seneca Valley Middle School earns national recognition a second time
A national group advocating for middle-school reform has honored Seneca Valley Middle School.
The National Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform named Seneca Valley as a “School to Watch.”
“We are proud of the teachers, staff and students who have worked so hard over the years to make Seneca Valley Middle School an example of educational excellence,” said Seneca Valley Superintendent Tracy Vitale.
The school earned the same distinction three years ago, said Linda Andreassi, Seneca Valley spokeswoman.
Since 1999, the “Schools to Watch” program has recognized more than 340 schools in 19 states.
It identifies schools that meet the group's criteria for high performance, including academic excellence, developmental responsiveness, outstanding organizational structure and social equity.
“They make education so exciting that students and teachers don't want to miss a day,” said Deborah Kadak, National Forum's executive director.
Seneca Valley Middle School scored a 90.5 as part of its Pennsylvania School Performance Profile.
Schools are assessed on a 100-point scale, and scores of 70 or higher met standards for 2012-13. The profiles replaced Adequate Yearly Progress goals mandated by the federal No Child Left Behind Act.
Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.