Cranberry women take part in PSU fundraiser
Elexa Baron danced for 46 hours straight last weekend but was more exhausted in the following days.
“It's later in the week when it catches up with you,” said Baron, 22, of Cranberry, a Penn State University student who was one of 707 dancers in the Penn State Dance MaraTHON, commonly known as THON.
Since 1977, the dance has raised more than $101 million for the fight against pediatric cancer.
This year's dance raised $13.34 million — a record.
It is the largest student fundraising event in the United States. The money goes to the Four Diamonds Fund at Penn State Hershey Medical Center.
Baron, a senior who plans to attend veterinary school next year, has been involved in THON for all four years she's been at Penn State.
This was the first year that she danced.
“It's an incredibly long time. It is difficult and challenging. It is not really dancing sometimes. You are just moving around the whole time,” Baron said.
About 15,000 people attend the event, which is held at Penn State's Bryce Jordan Center in University Park. Most do not dance. Yet nearly all have been involved in planning and fundraising for the event.
Lauren Hoyt, 21, of Cranberry, got involved as a family tradition. Her older sister, Kaitlin Hoyt, participated in THON as a student at Penn State, and her mother, Amy Hoyt, danced in it when she was a student.
“It keeps getting better and better,” said Lauren Hoyt, a senior majoring in public relations who volunteers as a media manager.
Hoyt is also involved in the event for personal reasons. Her cousin, Lee Myers of New Castle, died from cancer in 2009 at 24.
“I was determined to do something for him,” Hoyt said.
Rick Wills is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7944 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.