ShareThis Page

ER visits at Butler Memorial hospital decreased last year; illnesses more severe

| Saturday, March 29, 2014, 12:15 p.m.
Dr. Dave Rottinghaus and Crissy Emrick discuss issues at Memorial Hospital in Butler Tuesday, March, 25, 2014.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Dr. Dave Rottinghaus and Crissy Emrick discuss issues at Memorial Hospital in Butler Tuesday, March, 25, 2014.
Dr. Dave Rottinghaus and Crissy Emrick at Memorial Hospital in Butler Tuesday, March, 25, 2014.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
Dr. Dave Rottinghaus and Crissy Emrick at Memorial Hospital in Butler Tuesday, March, 25, 2014.

Fewer people are using the emergency room at Butler Memorial Hospital, but when they do, they appear to be coming in sicker than ever.

Patient volume decreased 2 percent last year after a steady increase from 2010-12, said Crissy Emrick, director of emergency service at the hospital, but the severity of patient illness or injury increased, she said.

“I think sometimes patients are waiting, thinking that they're going to see if they can get better, and they just don't,” Emrick said. “So by the time they come in, they're pretty sick.”

Dr. Dave Rottinghaus, emergency department director at the hospital, said the ER saw about 48,000 patients in 2012. The next year, that number dipped below 47,000.

“But very sick people are still coming and coming even more,” he said. “The treat-and-release people are in smaller numbers.”

Hospital officials say they're not sure what caused the downward trend, but they have some ideas.

One could be the increasing amount of urgent-care and rapid-treatment centers that bridge the gap between primary doctors' offices and emergency rooms, Rottinghaus said. MedExpress Urgent Care, for example, opened its first office in Western Pennsylvania just 10 years ago but now has 35.

“It's not really a surprise that there's such a demand for patient-focused services,” said Kelly Sorice, spokeswoman for MedExpress. “It's accessible, affordable and convenient, and I think that's what most patients are looking for.”

Another factor in the decrease could be that health insurers are making ER visits more expensive, Emrick said.

“Some of the thoughts out there are related to people having a change in their insurance, having higher co-pays for emergency department care,” she said. “The emergency room is not a cheap place to receive care.”

The decrease translates to 10 to 15 fewer patients a day, Emrick said. Staffing levels remain the same, however. In emergency medicine, always expect the unexpected, Emrick said.

“We have to be able to staff for whatever may come through the door,” she said.

Though it's too early to say how many patients will come through the ER this year, Rottinghaus said the volume has begun to increase to 2012's level, and he expects that to continue.

“Since March 1, we're seeing an uptick in our daily volume, so it's going to sort of back to what it was,” Rottinghaus said. “Whether we'll be busier than last year, I don't know … but most people think ER department volume nationally will go up again.

“My best guess is that the population is not getting younger, and it's growing, especially the older population,” he said.

Rachel Farkas is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-779-6902 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.