Cranberry officials, police agree to contract
Cranberry supervisors on Tuesday ratified a three-year contract with township police, avoiding arbitration.
“It's all about communicating with each other,” Manager Jerry Andree said.
The contract covers 28 uniformed officers, who will receive pay raises of 2.75 percent in the first year, and 2.5 percent in the second and third years.
Other changes include a deferred retirement option program, increased flexibility in scheduling and increasing the amount officers pay toward their health care premiums from 7 percent to 8 percent.
In a statement, Supervisor John Skorupan said that “Cranberry's police department is the most professional local law enforcement agency in Butler County and among the finest in all of Southwestern Pennsylvania.”
Andree said the township losing its contract to provide police service in Seven Fields did not affect contract negotiations.
Seven Fields and Evans City have formed a regional police force that will begin operating in 2015.
Seven Fields had been paying Cranberry to patrol the community.
The township stands to lose about $370,000 next year because of the regional force.
Andree said the township, with advance warning that Seven Fields wanted to end the contract, has been watching its spending.
It last hired a police officer in December 2012.
The police department had been without a contract since the beginning of the year.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.