Skundrich convicted in 2002 rape in Cranberry
A Butler County jury convicted a former county man on Thursday of rape and other charges in connection with a 2002 attack on a woman in her Cranberry home.
Ralph S. Skundrich also was found guilty of burglary and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse.
Judge William Shaffer postponed sentencing until he determines whether Skundrich is a sexually violent predator under state law.
Skundrich received a 75- to 100-year prison sentence in April for a sexual assault in Allegheny County, also in 2002.
The Cranberry attack occurred on June 6, 2002. A woman reported that she woke up to find a man standing over her bed. The man threatened to kill her and her young child, who was asleep nearby, police said. The man sexually assaulted her and threatened to come back and hurt her and the child if she reported the attack to police. Once he left, the woman called 911.
DNA collected at the scene was compared to DNA that existed in the Combined DNA Index system at the time. It was not until 2010 that state police could connect the DNA to Skundrich.
The Tribune-Review does not identify victims of sexual assault.
Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.