ShareThis Page

Court will decide fate of former Freeway Lanes in Jackson

| Saturday, June 28, 2014, 3:20 p.m.
The former Freeway Lanes in Jackson is now being used as a storage area for Baierl Ford vehicles. The property is in bankruptcy court.
The former Freeway Lanes in Jackson is now being used as a storage area for Baierl Ford vehicles. The property is in bankruptcy court.The former Freeway Lanes in Jackson is now being used as a storage area for Baierl Ford vehicles. The property is in bankruptcy court.

Once a popular spot for Butler County bowlers, the former Freeway Lanes Bowling Alley along Route 19 in Jackson now is just a parking lot for excess inventory from Baierl Ford.

The bowling alley and its adjoining Striker's Sports Bar have long been shuttered, and the property remains mired in federal bankruptcy as rumors swirl about possible development.

On June 20, things got more complicated when two former operators of the lanes filed a federal defamation lawsuit against the head of the corporation that ran the enterprise.

James Marburger and his daughter, Carrie R. Robb, both of Evans City, claim that Robert Kennihan, president of the seven-member Zelienople Investment Corp., made false statements about them during a June 3, 2013, meeting.

Kennihan denied that.

“I'd like to see it stay as a bowling alley,” Kennihan said. “This area needs it. It's in a nice location and everything.”

A federal bankruptcy judge likely will decide the fate of the property.

James and Patti Marburger, of Evans City, claim they made more than $700,000 in loans to the business, according to federal court paperwork. Patti Marburger said the family had been involved with the business dating to the 1960s and had been managing it.

The Marburgers and several bowling alley employees are trying to force the property into involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy, filing their petition about a year ago.

According to court paperwork, the Marburger Farm Dairy Corp. became involved in the Zelienople Corp. in July 1968, acting as guarantor to loans by Citizens National Bank to establish and operate the bowling alley.

By 2011, according to the documents, the Marburger corporation decided the bowling alley wasn't making enough money, so the firm decided to sell it and its liquor license to recoup money on the loans. At a shareholders meeting on June 3, 2013, an agreement was reached to sell the property.

James Marburger and Robb had controlled the Zelienople Investment Corp., according to court documents, but were removed by the company's shareholders during that June meeting, with Kennihan taking over as president from Marburger.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas P. Agresti approved the sale of the bowling alley's liquor license on June 12, 2013, to Cranberry Springs Development Group 2 LLC for $250,000. That transfer, according to state records, is pending,

A hearing is scheduled in bankruptcy court for July 21, and a status conference is scheduled for Sept. 16.

Kennihan said an audit of the bowling alley's finances hasn't been completed.

Patti Marburger said her family doesn't know what will happen with the property.

“Bowling is not the best thing right now,” Patti Marburger said. “If you go to New Jersey, you can sell a bowling alley in two minutes. But around here, no.”

Kennihan of Natrona Heights, who built the alley in the 1960s, said there's been interest in the property, from car dealers to grocery chains.

“Several people want to keep it as a bowling alley. We'll find out when the time comes,” Kennihan said.

Bill Vidonic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5621 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.