Mars Area drilling foes seek school 'safe zone'
Concerned parents packed the Mars Area School board meeting room on Tuesday to push for establishment of a “safe zone” around school district property that would bar Marcellus shale drilling.
“The group and supporters are not tired. We are committed to protecting our children. The only way to truly mitigate risk is to not drill wells near our children,” said Amy Nassif, spokesperson for the Mars Parent Group.
Rex Energy has submitted applications to the state Department of Environmental Protection to drill wells on farmland near Mars Area schools.
The parent group maintains the proposed wells in Middlesex would be within a half-mile of the schools,
“It does not belong this close to schools,” Nassif said.
The company says they would be about three-quarters of a mile away in Adams.
State law requires a 500-foot buffer between school buildings and drilling sites.
The parent group scheduled a meeting on Tuesday afternoon with DEP representatives and Rex Energy to express their concerns.
DEP has said has said that it didn't plan to rule on the drilling application until after the meeting.
On March 11, the school board rejected a proposal from Rex Energy to drill beneath district property.
The group has been collecting online donations through the Clean Air Council in Philadelphia to challenge Middlesex's zoning of the site in court.
Akasha Chamberlain is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.