TribLIVE

| News


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

A good kind of deficit

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, July 30, 2009
 

In an event that many pundits hail as a silver lining of America's still-dark economic cloud, the U.S. current-account deficit fell during the first quarter of 2009 by 34.5 percent from its level in the fourth quarter of 2008.

Is this news really all that good• Of course, many people think so. After all, anything called a "deficit" must be bad. So a shrinkage of such a bad thing must be good. Right?

Wrong.

The U.S. runs a trade deficit whenever we Americans import more, value-wise, than we export. But an excess of imports over exports is hardly a calamity. Indeed, it's much more likely to be a blessing.

To see why, ask what explains foreigners' choice not to spend all of their dollars on American exports. The reason is the same one that explains your choice not to spend all of your dollars at the supermarket, the mall and the liquor store: You choose to save and invest part of your earnings because such savings and investment will likely enhance your wealth over time.

If you save and invest wisely, though, not only are you made better off, but workers and consumers are also made better off. Saving is necessary for investment; market-driven investment increases worker productivity; and higher worker productivity means higher wages over time and a larger economic pie.

Fortunately, since 1975 -- the last year that America ran a trade surplus -- foreigners have been annual net investors in the U.S. Rather than spend every last one of their dollars buying American exports, foreigners invest some of their dollars in the U.S. economy. These investments raise America's trade deficit, but they also raise America's capital-account surplus. In other words, they make America a net recipient of world savings.

It's absurd for Americans to complain about foreigners' eagerness to invest in dollar-denominated assets -- which is what complaints about the U.S. trade deficit amount to. In addition to directly raising the values of many assets held by Americans, increased investment in America by foreigners adds to our capital stock every bit as much as does increased investment in America by Floridians.

Also bear in mind that today about one-third of America's imports are not consumer goods but, instead, are inputs to American output -- Brazilian steel for American-made airplanes, Japanese power tools for American workers to use to construct houses in America, Chinese laptop-computer assembly for Apple and Dell.

Although these imports contribute to the U.S. trade deficit, they are evidence against the myth that America's "appetite" for imports reflects American consumerism gone wild. The Americans buying these imports do so not to gratify immediate consumption desires but, rather, to produce for the market.

To restrict these imports would inevitably put a tight pinch on many American producers -- in some cases, perhaps the pinch of bankruptcy.

Beyond contributing to American economic vitality, foreign investment here signals global confidence in that vitality. Investors go long only in assets or places that promise a reasonable prospect of future profits.

These facts are why the recent decline in America's trade deficit is just another piece of bad news: Foreign investors, like their American counterparts, are less willing now to take risks in this economy. As foreigners grow more reluctant to invest here, they become less eager to earn dollars by selling goods and services to Americans. So foreigners export less to America.

History reflects the validity of this analysis. During the Greatly Depressed 1930s, America ran a trade deficit for only 18 of the 120 months of that decade. In each of the other 102 months, Americans exported more than they imported -- that is, ran trade surpluses. The only calendar year of that decade that saw America's trade in deficit was 1936 -- and then only slightly. All of the other nine years were ones of trade surpluses.

For the decade as a whole, America ran a trade surplus of $4.92 billion, which was 19 percent of the value of America's total exports during the 1930s.

These data from the Great Depression suggest that trade surpluses neither help an economy nor are evidence that an economy's fundamentals are sound. Quite the opposite, in fact. As long as the U.S. economy remains in turmoil, foreign investors will be scared away, as they were during the Great Depression -- causing our trade deficit to shrink and possibly even to disappear. Americans will be all the poorer.

Let's hope for the rapid restoration of U.S. economic vitality. When that time comes, wise Americans will celebrate what will surely be a return to the days of high and growing U.S. trade deficits.

Donald J. Boudreaux is chairman of the department of economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va. His column appears twice monthly.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Foreign influx in Allegheny County at ‘tipping point’
  2. Steelers hope group of low-budget cornerbacks can deliver
  3. Steelers WR Wheaton wants to produce after injury-plagued rookie year
  4. Steelers notebook: Ben believes rookie WR Bryant can contribute
  5. Inside the ropes: Roethlisberger may have his big receiver
  6. Former Gateway coach Smith is ‘perfect fit’ for Penn State football staff
  7. Home sellers are able to remain mum about violent crimes committed there
  8. Construction of $500M power plant in South Huntingdon stalled
  9. Pirates avert sweep with 7-5 victory over Rockies
  10. Pirates notebook: Hurdle, Huntington on same page
  11. Squirrel Hill Tunnel workers cope with speeders, exhaust fumes
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.