Being Mike Huckabee
Whose yardstick do you use to measure the impact of Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee's second-place showing in the Iowa Straw Poll?
"If he had money, he would be our worst nightmare," says Democrat strategist John Lapp.
Lapp, who helped bring down Republicans in 2006 as executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said, "The real threat of Mike Huckabee is that he is a happy warrior, a down-home guy comfortable in his own skin. Right-wing conservatism with a smile."
Fresh off his low-funded, second-place showing last weekend, Huckabee said in an interview with the Trib that he feels more like a man who placed first.
"It felt like a win to me, and it speaks to what Republicans look for in leadership -- they want a candidate that is going to be frugal with their tax dollars," the former Arkansas governor said. "If you are completely opulent with your own money, chances are you really are going to be wild with somebody else's money."
Strategists on both political sides agree Huckabee has great appeal to Middle Americans who work hard to support their families, who want lower taxes and responsible leadership, and who go to church every Sunday but don't feel the need to tell you all about it.
"A Huckabee supporter is not a hedge-fund manager," Huckabee himself explained. "He is probably some guy who trims his own hedges on weekends. More Main Street than Wall Street."
Since his strong showing in Iowa every analyst who has ever stuffed an envelope suggests that Huckabee makes the perfect vice-presidential candidate.
"Six months ago, no one thought that I belonged on the stage," Huckabee said. "Now they are saying, 'Gee, he ought to be at least vice president.' ... Give me a few more months, and they will be asking me, 'Which one of these guys would you like to pick as your running mate?' "
Yet Huckabee said he will never come out and say "no" to a vice-presidential offer because "that just makes you look like an idiot when you later end up taking it, if you do.
"I am not being facetious or coy. I just really don't sit around thinking about, 'Hey, if I really work real hard, I might get to be No. 2.' "
In politics there are always paradigm shifts, changes from one way of thinking to another. Huckabee's emergence in Iowa pushed Tommy Thompson completely out of the GOP race. But it also came at a cost to another Thompson.
"He definitely cuts into Fred Thompson," said Republican strategist Charlie Gerow. "Huckabee easily picks up the disaffected Republicans that were the 'none of the above' in the AP poll last month, taking big chunks of them into his column."
Huckabee also has impressed some Republicans as the "straight-talker" of the 2008 campaign. He is armed not with anger, but with wit. His quips are reminiscent of Will Rogers.
Like Rogers, most of what Huckabee says comes straight from the hip. He calls it "one of the benefits of not having a lot of money -- I can't afford a room full of consultants and scriptwriters who tell me what to say and what not to say."
"Some of the candidates are so scripted and so handled that there is nothing spontaneous about them."
Lapp says Huckabee definitely passes the classic "which candidate would you rather have a beer with" test. It's just that Huckabee doesn't drink beer.
"Would Diet Pepsi work?" Huckabee asks.
He doesn't wait for an answer. Time for him to go. He needs to get on the phone to make fundraising calls -- "lots of them."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.