ShareThis Page

Will Rogers on Congress

| Sunday, June 24, 2007

People sure are unhappy with Congress. Gallup says its approval rating is at 14 percent -- the lowest ever. The timeless wit and wisdom of Will Rogers explains why:

  • "Congress is so strange; a man gets up to speak and says nothing, nobody listens, and then everybody disagrees."

  • "We all joke about Congress, but we can't improve on them. Have you noticed that no matter who we elect, he is just as bad as the one he replaces?"

  • "When Congress makes a joke it's a law, and when they make a law, it's a joke."

Rogers spoke these words in the 1920s and 1930s, but they're just as true now. When voters put Democrats in office, they voted for change -- voted for an end to partisan yapping. But the yapping has gotten worse.

They also voted for Democrats to end the sloppy, arrogant, fiscally irresponsible ways of Republicans, but Democrats were happy to pick right up where the Republicans left off.

As for jokes that are laws and laws that are jokes, is anybody happy with Congress' immigration reform initiatives?

Of course there's nothing new about the shenanigans of Congress:

  • "We cuss Congress, and we joke about 'em, but they are all good fellows at heart, and if they wasn't in Congress, why, they would be doing something else against us that might be even worse."

  • "Never blame a legislative body for not doing something. When they do nothing, they don't hurt anybody. When they do something is when they become dangerous."

That is for certain. There are some nutty ideas floating around in Congress, but so long as they never become laws, no harm is done. And because our government is divided, thank goodness it's hard for either side to ram any agenda through.

And the country usually runs better when Congress is unable to get things done.

Rogers saved some of his best barbs for the Senate, the allegedly august body of distinguished minds that is supposed to snuff out bad ideas and bills and advance good ones. Though even during Rogers' time, things hardly ever turned out that way:

  • "About all I can say for the United States Senate is that it opens with a prayer and closes with an investigation."

  • "Senators are a never-ending source of amusement, amazement and discouragement."

  • "The Senate just sits and waits till they find out what the president wants, so they know how to vote against him."

I'm amazed that Rogers could describe Sen. Harry Reid some 70 years before Reid became Senate majority leader. Reid truly is a fellow who is "not as narrow-minded as he forces himself to be."

That's what is most agitating about our Congress. Too many members on both sides of the aisle are narrow-minded, partisan and looking to advance their self-interests.

The average American doesn't like that. The average American knows that the country is facing giant challenges -- entitlement programs that are going to bankrupt us, radicals who want to blow us up, spending that has spiraled out of control ...

The average American wants these problems to be solved by people who are interested in the good of their country -- not Republicans and Democrats interested in the good of their parties.

It's no wonder we are disgusted. Of course, that's nothing new either:

  • "It's getting so if a man wants to stand well socially, he can't afford to be seen with either the Democrats or the Republicans."

  • "There is something about a Republican that you can only stand him just so long; and on the other hand, there is something about a Democrat that you can't stand him quite that long."

We can only hope our Congress begins to comprehend what the American people have been trying to tell it -- that it needs to get in step with the wisdom and will of the people.

And that "our country is not where it is today on account of any one man. It's here on account of the real common sense of the Big Normal Majority."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.