By Ralph R. Reiland
Published: Monday, July 17, 2006
In 1959, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and Vice President Richard Nixon walked through a replica of a six-room American ranch house that was on display at the American National Exhibition in Moscow.
As the two superpower leaders entered the kitchen area, Nixon pointed to the dishwasher and said, "In America, we like to make life easier for women." Instead of pointing out the inherent sexism in Nixon's statement -- i.e., the assumption that dirty pots are women's work -- Khrushchev responded with knee-jerk Marxist sophistry: "Your capitalist attitude toward women does not occur under communism."
Checking out the newfangled gadgets in the kitchen, Khrushchev saw nothing more than a capitalist scheme of planned obsolescence. "Your American houses are built to last only 20 years so builders could sell new houses at the end," he told Nixon. "We build firmly. We build for our children and grandchildren."
The Soviet premier additionally complained that the American exhibit wasn't complete: "It's clear to me that the construction workers didn't manage to finish their work and the exhibit is not put in order. This is what America is capable of, and how long has she existed• Three hundred years• One hundred and fifty years of independence and this is her level?"
Sticking with his view of collectivist superiority, Khrushchev told Nixon he felt sorry for Americans: "If you want to live under capitalism, go ahead, and that's your question, an internal matter. It doesn't concern us. We can feel sorry for you, but really, you wouldn't understand."
Khrushchev then delivered a flawed forecast to Nixon, a picture of the Soviet Union as a new and dynamic enterprise, a young and scientifically planned system fully capable of burying the ineptness and disorganization of American capitalism on its last legs: "We haven't quite reached 42 years, and in another seven years we'll be at the level of America, and after that we'll go farther. As we pass you by, we'll wave 'hi' to you, and then if you want, we'll stop and say, 'Please come along behind us.' "
By December of 1991, the collapse of the Soviet Union was complete. What Khrushchev didn't understand is that a system of brute force that demanded individual servitude to the state was no match for a nation that combined democratic freedoms with the vitality of capitalism.
Explaining the monumental failure of the Soviet system and empire, Gen. Dmitri Volkogonov, a former official Soviet military historian, stressed that "the roots of the catastrophe lay in the ideology itself, in Leninism."
All told, the "catastrophe" of attempting to impose a Marxist-Leninist utopia in the Soviet Union resulted in the deaths of as many as 25 million people, according to recently released and hitherto inaccessible Soviet archives -- a death toll that was the direct consequence of centrally planned massacres, mass deportations, labor camps, torture and famine.
Many of the grisly details behind this colossal slaughter are recorded in The Black Book of Communism, an 800-page summary by a team of scholars that documents the violence and terror that Soviet leaders employed against their own people.
Within months of his rise to power, Lenin provided the definition of "revolutionary justice" to a workers' assembly: "If the masses do not rise up spontaneously, none of this will lead to anything. For as long as we fail to treat speculators the way they deserve --- with a bullet in the head --- we will not get anywhere."
The targets of this "justice" included shopkeepers, landlords, non-Bolshevik newspapers, non-Bolshevik political parties, the clergy, "counter-revolutionary" civil servants, intellectuals, "aristocrats," industrial strikers and malingering "pseudoworkers," entrepreneurs, gun owners, craftsmen, "bourgeois specialists," landowners, and, most especially, "money grubbing" kulaks, i.e., better-off peasants.
Simply stated, Lenin's "bullet in the head" form of "justice" was the officially prescribed punishment for any person "belonging to a hostile social class."
On Aug. 10, 1918, for instance, Lenin telegrammed instructions for dealing with kulaks who were expressing opposition to having their harvests confiscated by the government: "You must make an example of these people: (1) Hang (I mean hang publicly, so that people see it) at least 100 kulaks, rich bastards, and known bloodsuckers. (2) Publish their names. (3) Seize all their grain. P.S. Find tougher people."
By the time it was over, the Soviet Union's "tougher" enforcers had killed millions through forced collectivization and harvest seizures, work camps, gulag colonies, prisons and political executions.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.