Avoid mad cow disease - eat ostrich instead
Oh graceful ostrich, you flightless bird of white wing tip and elegant plume. To witness you darting across the verdant plain would be breathtakingly magnificent.
So would grinding you up into patties, frying a few until they are well done, putting them on a sesame-seed bun, then devouring them with some pickles, onions and perhaps a bit of Swiss cheese.
Such is the less-than-subtle advice of a company called Ostriches On Line (www.ostrich.com), which identifies itself as a totally and vertically integrated ostrich business. With anxiety over mad cow disease being the first documented trend of the new year, the ostrich company wants you to boost its business by incorporating ostrich into your diet.
"Ostrich meat is lower in fat, cholesterol and calories than skinless chicken or turkey," company spokesman Steve Warrington said. And, "right now, with all this mad cow disease, I don't think I would really want anything else on my dinner plate."
Thank you, Mr. Warrington, for that thoroughly objective analysis of the not-nearly-yet an epidemic.
The American Ostrich Association also endorses ostrich consumption. Its Web site boasts recipes for such delicacies as grilled ostrich with wild mushrooms in a mustard sauce, and ostrich and shrimp in roasted garlic sauce.
The association does not recommend boiling ostrich eggs. Because a single ostrich egg is about the size of two dozen chicken eggs, it takes about an hour to soft-boil an ostrich egg and an hour and a half to hard-boil one. Who has the time for that?
Curious about the beef industry's reaction to this blatant attempt to undercut it, I called the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. Spokeswoman Michele Peterson did not seem overly concerned.
"I'm wondering if consumers could even find ostrich in the grocery stores," she said. "We're not worried about people giving up beef. We're confident that consumers are confident that it's safe to eat."
Asked whether the beef association wanted to rumble with the ostrich types because of this blatant attempt to steal away business, Peterson said, "I honestly don't think it tops our priority list."
The beef association might not be angry over this, but the product that bears its name sure should be. Ostrich organizations want people to forsake the bovine for the bird. If you were a cow, how could you not take such a blatant insult personally?
If any cows weren't mad before, this affront ought to put 'em over the edge.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.