Experts: Presidential campaign in Pennsylvania looks like '04
By Salena Zito
Published: Saturday, Sept. 22, 2012, 9:17 p.m.
Some experts believe the presidential campaign in Pennsylvania looks familiar — 2004, perhaps?
In that campaign, Republican President George Bush and Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic nominee, battled for independent and undecided voters amid a deeply polarized electorate. A Tribune-Review poll suggests a similar dynamic in 2012 as Democratic President Obama squares off with GOP nominee Mitt Romney.
So the Trib asked two seasoned political strategists to explain how they would command the final weeks of the race.
Former Democratic Party state chairman T.J. Rooney and Republican strategist Dick Brabender agree the candidate who wins the suburbs of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh will emerge victorious.
“Get your voters out,” said Rooney, a former Lehigh County lawmaker. “I know that that sounds oversimplified, but I cannot stress the importance of identifying who your voters are and making sure that you have a system in place to physically get them to the polls on Election Day.”
Obama holds an edge, since registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by 1.2 million, but “Republican voters are much more excited about voting against Obama than Obama voters are about turning out to vote again,” Rooney said.
Rooney does not believe the race is as close as the Trib survey, conducted by Susquehanna Polling and Research, suggests. “On the other hand, if I am running this thing, I am running as if I am 2 points behind,” he said.
Brabender, an Erie native who successfully engineered statewide races for Republicans, most recently worked with former Sen. Rick Santorum in the GOP presidential primaries.
Brabender would take advantage of the “right track, wrong track” numbers on the economy to lock in soft supporters.
“The message would be to get the narrative beyond Romney reminding voters of the failed policies of the president and get them to believe Romney can do a better job and take America to a better place,” he said.
That would require giving voters more exposure to Romney, whose campaign isn't advertising in the state. Brabender would air ads that aren't exclusively negative.
“The jobs numbers are great negative ads all into themselves,” he said. “So instead of attacking Obama with an ad, have one with Romney interacting with his wife, Ann. It would allow voters to make a judgment on him on a personal level.”
Brabender would deploy campaign surrogates to talk to people in sportsmen clubs, small businesses and elsewhere to tell people how the Obama administration's policies have affected their lives.
“These voters want to know Romney shares their values — want to see the contrast between him and Obama,” he said. “They need people who can talk to them about the impact of regulation in our manufacturing segment, China's impact on trade, and talk about, specifically, gun rights.”
Salena Zito is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.