Sandusky a victim only in his own mind
Jerry Sandusky had one final indignity to foist upon his victims.
Sandusky on Tuesday painted himself as a victim, even as he was painted into a corner of the penal system reserved for society's vilest members. Convicted of molesting 10 boys during a 15-year period, the notorious predator received a prison sentence that will keep him locked up, at minimum, until he is 98 years old.
Clad in red inmate garb, the former Penn State assistant football coach took center stage in the Centre County courtroom for what likely was one of his final public utterances. The moment cried out for contrition, for apology, for acknowledgment at the endgame that he at least was cognizant of the depth of his depravity.
Sandusky observed three of the people he assaulted take the stand to relate how their lives were forever altered by his monstrous deeds. He then delivered a vainglorious monologue in which he incredibly asserted that the person who was wronged in this whole sordid affair was the fellow who was speaking.
He reiterated the claim, first made on Monday in a taped broadcast on the Penn State student radio station, that he was the victim of an extraordinarily vast conspiracy that stopped just short of involving Russian mobsters and tentacled extraterrestrials.
In good ol' Jerry's eyes, the sinister cabal included:
• Greedy guys (looking to profit by fabricating tales of his feral affections toward them).
• Investigators (irrationally fixated on his innocent habit of showering with minors).
• His longtime employer, Penn State (which failed to support him when these false claims first arose, other than attempting to cover them up and having two top administrators allegedly perjure themselves. Some help all of that was.)
• The media (which sensationalized the story when it should have been reporting on Afghanistan or something).
• Civil attorneys (looking to profit by working in concert with — and bringing the conspiracy full circle back to — the greedy guys).
About the only person escaping blame in this game was Sandusky's adopted adult son, Matt Sandusky, who told prosecutors he was willing to testify that he had been molested as a youth. Although Matt Sandusky clearly was part of the conspiracy, perhaps his father spared his son any admonishment out of gratitude that he never took the stand.
The real victims deserved better than Sandusky's self-serving claim of victimhood and innocence, his avoidance of accountability, his nauseating narcissism. They certainly can't be blamed if they hope his preference for prison accommodations pans out.
Sandusky has expressed a desire to be housed with the general population at the correctional facility where he will spend the rest of his days. That's an extremely unwise — some would say stupid — stance for an unrepentant child molester to take.
Sandusky considers himself a victim now?
Wait till he sees what happens if his wish is granted.
Eric Heyl is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7857 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.