Western Pa. school districts grapple with need for armed guards
By Mike Wereschagin and Bill Vidonic
Published: Friday, Dec. 14, 2012, 11:52 p.m.
As parents, educators and others struggle with the grim question of how to protect children in a place that's supposed to be safe, one Western Pennsylvania school district is considering accelerating the deployment of armed guards to its buildings.
Butler Area School District directors voted this week to arm school police within three months, but upon Friday's school shooting in Newtown, Conn., board members plan to meet early next week to speed up the process.
“We're going to do everything we need to do to protect our students and staff,” Butler Area Superintendent Michael Strutt said. “If that means putting an armed officer in every building, that's what we'll do.”
Of the state's 498 school districts, 118 use armed guards, according to the state Department of Education. Thirteen alternative education institutions, most of them charter schools, have armed guards as well.
Parents responded to the second-deadliest school shooting in U.S. history on Friday with a mix of sorrow, confusion and fatalism. Twenty children and six adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School suffered fatal wounds, Connecticut State Police said. The shooter killed himself, police said.
“If somebody truly wants to do something like that, they'll find a way ... whether it's to sneak past security or waiting outside,” said Ted Oshie, whose two children attend Grandview Elementary School in the Derry Area School District in Westmoreland County.
Security procedures at districts vary, from sign-in sheets to remote-controlled locks to armed guards. Ninety-nine percent of public schools require visitors to sign in, 92 percent lock or monitor doors during school hours and 63 percent have an electronic notification system for a schoolwide emergency, according to a study by the National Center for Education Statistics.
Each layer of security owes its existence to tragedies such as the 1999 Columbine High School shooting and Virginia Tech massacre in 2007. Newtown likely will leave its own legacy, said Francisco Negron, general council of the National Association of School Boards.
Most school shootings involved a troubled student. This shooting, reportedly by a man whose mother taught at the elementary school, would “now focus the conversation toward the external person coming in, and how schools will deal with that,” Negron said.
Entrance to Pittsburgh Public Schools buildings is controlled from within by remote lock, and several schools use metal detectors. School police in Pittsburgh, the state's second-largest district, do not carry guns.
“We benefit by having school police who work in partnership with city police,” Pittsburgh schools spokeswoman Ebony Pugh.
State law requires districts to get a judge's approval to arm officers and grant them arrest powers. The state Department of Education defers to local districts on the issue, spokesman Tim Eller said.
Greensburg Salem High School considered posting an armed officer at the high school after two teenagers killed 12 classmates and a teacher at Columbine, but a disagreement with the city over who would pay for it scuttled the plan. Some people worried about having an armed officer in the school, but Greensburg police Chief Wally Lyons said an unarmed guard would be useless.
“He is no good to anyone, including himself, unless he is armed,” Lyons said.
About one in four schools across the country have police or security personnel inside on a daily basis, Negron said.
No matter how many precautions a district takes, it might not be enough, said Joe Lutz, a Hempfield school director and the parent of two elementary-age children.
“What if they're carrying a concealed weapon?” Lutz said. “The only thing left is to lock down the schools and make every person subject to a metal detector and search everyone. Then what? Do you search the cars in the parking lot?”
Despite the shooting, the idea of armed guards patrolling hallways strikes some as unsettling. Jim Keffalas, a Butler school board member who voted against arming school security on Monday said the Newtown tragedy moved him “a notch or two” toward arming guards.
“But I still feel I'd like to have more discussions, look at more statistical data and talk to more experts,” Keffalas said. “I'm still not sure whether the arming of the secondary school police is what we need to do at this point.”
An hour before the Newtown shooting, students at the Butler Area High School said there hadn't been much talk this week about the decision. It seemed a distant concern, a problem only in theory, and some responded to it with a shrug.
“If they have to use force, they have to use force,” said senior Cody Gilbert, 18, of Butler. “It's nice to have (a weapon) if you need it. You can never be too safe.”
Staff writers Rich Gazarik, Joe Napsha and Paul Peirce contributed. Bill Vidonic and Mike Wereschagin are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Vidonic can be reached at email@example.com. Werschagin is at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Analysis: Kesler remains on Penguins’ radar as Shero looks bring back ‘Big 3’ formula
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye
- Ukrainians steel to resist Russian aggression
- Ex-Colts executive Polian: Approach free agency with caution
- Penguins GM Shero’s deadline deals: Addition by subtraction
- Pirates’ big risk with pitch-heavy draft focus might soon pay off
- With so many needs, Steelers can ill afford to miss in draft
- Vietnam says it may have found missing jet’s door
- Greensburg bishop’s time at helm draws to a close
- Penguins minor league report: Defenseman Dumoulin optimistic for home stretch