Share This Page

Vets study links PB pills, genetic variations to Gulf War illness

| Sunday, Jan. 25, 2015, 10:50 p.m.
Philip G. Pavely | Trib Total Media
The Rev. Barry Walker, 75, a former Army chaplain, suffers from Gulf War illness. He has been a national advocate for research regarding the physical causes of the illness.
Philip G. Pavely | Trib Total Media
The Rev. Barry Walker, 75, a former Army chaplain, suffers from Gulf War illness. He has been a national advocate for research regarding the physical causes of the illness.

A government-issued pill intended to protect troops from nerve agents may have made some troops more vulnerable to a chronic condition marked by headaches, cognitive problems, pain and fatigue, researchers say.

People with certain genetic variations were 40 times more likely to contract Gulf War illness if they took pyridostigmine bromide, or PB, pills that the Defense Department issued to protect them from soman, a nerve agent, during the 1990-91 war, researchers concluded in a study funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and published this month in the journal Environmental Health.

The study of 304 veterans provides compelling evidence that the illness has a physical rather than mental origin, experts said.

Veterans with Gulf War illness share symptoms such as persistent headaches, cognitive difficulties, widespread pain and fatigue.

Although that profile overlaps symptoms from conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder, Gulf War illness produces symptoms such as musculoskeletal problems that combat-stress illnesses don't, and relatively few Gulf War veterans saw combat, said Lea Steele, a researcher with Baylor University Institute of Biomedical Studies and lead author of the study.

“The only possible conclusion is that something else caused it,” Steele said, though she cautioned that “you don't want to say it's definitive with one study.”

The study's participants didn't know whether they had the genetic variation that made them more susceptible.

The research provides “extremely hard, convincing evidence that the cause of Gulf War illness must be toxic exposures,” said James H. Binns Jr., a Vietnam War veteran and Phoenix businessman who formerly chaired the Department of Veterans Affairs Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans Illnesses.

The Department of Veterans Affairs, which has held to the theory of a mental cause, said it “welcomes all additions to its scientific literature review.”

One-fourth to one-third of the 700,000 people who deployed to the Middle East contracted the illness. With no ready explanation for why others didn't become ill, early research seized on stress as a possible cause.

“VA scientists will review this new article and make sure that the Institute of Medicine Committee, currently engaged in a biennial review of Gulf War health issues, is aware of it and includes its findings in the literature review,” said Walinda West, a spokeswoman with the VA in Washington.

West said the agency “is committed to its investment in Gulf War research,” noting that it formed a research group Jan. 15 to study Gulf War-related brain cancer possibly associated with exposure to chemical nerve agents during demolition of a munitions depot in Khamisiyah, Iraq, in March 1991 after the ceasefire.

The VA expects to complete that study by spring, she said.

Pills had interim approval

As for Gulf War illness, “There's been a theory for a long time that there's probably a gene-environment interaction that determined which people got ill and which people escaped,” said Robert F. White, chair of environmental health at the Boston University School of Public Health.

The study in Environmental Health “doesn't explain everything,” White said. “It needs to be replicated. ... But it's kind of the first step in determining the genetic end of this.”

Other studies have linked PB pills to Gulf War illness but were based on veterans self-reporting illnesses.

When the pills were issued, the Food and Drug Administration hadn't yet approved them as a pretreatment for possible soman exposure but gave interim approval for the Gulf War. The Defense Department sought approval on the belief that Iraq used soman and other nerve agents against Iran in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War.

Binns has criticized the VA for its reluctance to accept the growing body of evidence for the physical causes of the illness, but he doesn't fault the government's decision to give troops the pills.

“I think people made the best decisions they could on the information that was known in 1991,” he said.

Going forward, the study should alert the Pentagon to risks that troops face and the necessity for screening them before issuing PB pills, he said.

It's unclear whether the Defense Department continued to issue them after that war.

Enzymes play role

One Gulf War veteran said finding a genetic link between the pills and illness is welcome news.

“That's what I said to Congress when I was there,” said the Rev. Barry Walker, 75, of East Palestine, Ohio. “I blamed that pill.”

The former Army chaplain served in post-war Korea, the Vietnam War, and was nearby when a Scud missile struck the barracks of the Hempfield-based 14th Quartermaster detachment in the First Gulf War.

He became a national advocate for treating Gulf War illness as a physical malady, based on his experience and that of other veterans. The VA's insistence of treating it as a mental illness similar to post-traumatic stress disorder has been frustrating, he said.

“I don't believe it's that,” he said. “I have PTSD, but that's because I saw too many wars.”

The physical symptoms he experienced after the Gulf War, which include fibromyalgia and fatigue, aren't what he experienced from Korea or Vietnam, he said.

“I had sore back after Korea, but that's because I was blown out of a Jeep,” he said.

Steele, the study's author, said scientists studying Gulf War illness largely accept a physical cause.

Several enzymes play a role in the body's response to toxic chemicals, and variations in those enzymes could explain why some troops were more vulnerable than others. This study of one enzyme explains, at most, only 10 percent of the cases, she said.

“We really need to look at the other enzymes as well,” Steele said.

Brian Bowling is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-325-4301. or bbowling@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.