ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Dr. Matthew A. Fisher

Stephen Huba
| Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2017, 5:03 p.m.
Dr. Matthew A. Fisher
Dr. Matthew A. Fisher

Noteworthy: Fisher recently was named co-editor-in-chief of Science Education & Civic Engagement: An International Journal. He joins Trace Jordan of New York University and managing editor Marcy Dubroff in overseeing the online journal devoted to exploring constructive connections between science education and civic engagement.

Age: 57

Residence: Hempfield

Family: Wife, Bettie Davis

Education: Bachelor's degree in biochemistry from Temple University and Ph.D. in biochemistry from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Occupation: Associate professor of chemistry at St. Vincent College, Unity

Background: Fisher joined the St. Vincent faculty in 1995. He served as department chair and director of the college's Teaching Enhancement and Mentoring Program for seven years. He is a senior fellow with the National Center for Science and Civic Engagement, a member of the American Chemical Society and a 2005 Carnegie Scholar. He is active in Science Education for New Civic Engagement and Responsibilities, or SENCER, which publishes the journal.

Quote: “Rather than starting with the science and, if time allows, trying to get to the real-world application, SENCER starts with complex civic issues that have a clear scientific component — things such as voter behavior, climate change, water quality, malnutrition, infectious diseases — before drilling down to the underlying scientific issues. It's starting with the civic issue and teaching through it, to the underlying scientific concepts that are important for understanding that issue.”

— Stephen Huba

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.