Pitt thrust into tough search for chief
The competition couldn't be much tougher.
When University of Pittsburgh Chancellor Mark Nordenberg announced his retirement last week, Pitt joined Penn State, Ohio State and the University of Michigan in high-stakes national presidential searches.
“In the case of Pitt, it's fairly safe to say they are looking for somebody who can walk across all three rivers simultaneously and speak fluent Pittsburgh,” said Terry Hartle, senior vice president of the American Council on Education in Washington.
“Of course, if you take out three rivers and Pittsburghese, that's what all of these search committees are seeking. They are looking for someone that will have great appeal and be able to connect with the huge array of constituencies within a modern research university. It is students, faculty, alumni donors, fundraisers, the football team, the community groups.”
He said a good fit — and Hartle puts Nordenberg in that category — can build a university. A poor fit can spell stagnation.
Former Allegheny County Executive Jim Roddey, who headed the search committee that picked Nordenberg, said the proliferation of vacancies is “obviously going to make this search harder.”
But he doubts there will be a shortage of qualified candidates. Roddey said 600 candidates applied for the post at Pitt in 1995.
Eva Tansky Blum, a PNC executive and vice chair of the Pitt trustees, is leading the search for Nordenberg's successor. She did not return a call for comment.
She is the second PNC executive to lead a university presidential search here in as many years. Jim Rohr, who retired as the corporation's CEO in May, led Carnegie Mellon University's search that culminated in the appointment of Subra Suresh as president.
Many hope that Pitt will seek a candidate who prioritizes regional issues.
“From our perspective, the universities are very important partners in regional economic development,” said Catherine DeLoughry of the Allegheny Conference on Community Development. “Mark Nordenberg has been an important leader and collaborator. We certainly hope his successor will do the same.”
County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, a Pitt trustee, said the new chancellor should mirror Nordenberg's work ethic and ability to lobby lawmakers in Harrisburg and Washington.
Although most universities hire leaders from academia, strong leaders can come from the outside, too, said Michael Poliakoff, vice president of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni. Former Sen. David Boren has become a respected leader at the University of Oklahoma. Purdue University selected former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels as president.
“What is crucial first and foremost is a profound sense of accountability to taxpayers and students,” Poliakoff said. “In the environment in which we're in today, when there is justified skepticism of the cost-effectiveness and academic standards of higher education, above all, the leader of a public institution needs to see the faces of the public and the students.”
At Pitt and Penn State, that means dealing with the fact that the schools annually top the list of the nation's highest-priced public universities. Pitt reclaimed the top spot from Penn State in a federal Department of Education survey released on Monday. It pegged annual tuition and mandatory fees for Pitt at $16,132, and for Penn State at $15,984.
Hartle said that won't scare any candidates away.
“The universities, even at that price, can attract more than enough qualified people to fill their freshmen classes. And compared to competition like George Washington, Penn or Case Western, tuition at $16,000 for an in-state resident is a bargain,” Hartle said.
Debra Erdley is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.