Pennsylvania legislators seek change in charter school funding
Local school officials have complained for years that charter schools siphon money from public school districts when students leave them to attend the alternative public schools.
State lawmakers expect to enact changes this fall in the funding formula for charter schools, along with measures to add greater accountability.
In late September, the state House passed a charter school reform bill that calls for tying funding directly to the cost of educating a child. A similar bill is in the state Senate Education Committee and could be sent to the floor for a vote this fall, said Casey Long, a spokesman for Senate President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati, R-Jefferson.
“We believe there is broad-based support to reform charter school funding and oversight,” Long said. “But work needs to be done to come to some agreement on how that should be done.”
Other issues include pension contributions, monitoring of academic achievement and teacher evaluation systems.
Calls to increase oversight of charter schools increased with the indictment in August of Nicholas Trombetta, the founder of the Midland-based PA Cyber charter school.
Trombetta, 58, of East Liverpool, Ohio, has pleaded not guilty to charges claiming he used the state's largest cyber-charter school to skim $1 million for himself.
A portion of the House bill, which passed by a 133-62 vote, addresses concerns school districts have raised about the formula used to channel taxpayer funding to cyber charter schools.
“Under the current system, the majority of the subsidy the state pays us for each student in our district follows the child when they withdraw and enroll in a charter school,” said Alan N. Johnson, acting superintendent of the Woodland Hills School District.
The loss of funding is particularly frustrating when a child attends a cyber charter school.
“It shouldn't cost as much to educate a child who is at home attending classes by computer as it does to teach students in a classroom,” Johnson said. “When a child leaves to attend a charter school, our costs don't go down significantly because we still have to pay for buildings, utilities, staff and programs for all the remaining students. So it's really a matter of fairness.”
The House bill calls for the establishment of a Charter School Funding Commission to develop a funding formula based on the actual cost of educating a child, according to state Rep. Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, the House majority leader.
Patricia Rosetti, CEO of the PA Distance Learning cyber charter school, said she would have “no problem” moving to a formula that uses actual costs to determine state funding.
“We spend every dollar we get, and I'd be happy to show the state exactly where the money is going,” she said.
But simply hiking the percentage of the state subsidy that a local district keeps would hurt students, she said.
“It's a misconception that we have significantly lower costs than traditional schools,” Rosetti said. “The bulk of our budget is for staff, and we try to maintain a 17 to 1 student-to-teacher ratio,” she said. “So if we get less money, we would have to consider increasing class size and reducing the programs we offer.”
School districts retain about 20 percent of the per-pupil state subsidy when a student leaves to attend a charter school, according to Tim Eller, a spokesman for the state Department of Education.
State Auditor General Eugene DePasquale, who has been pushing for charter school reform, said increasing the amount the local district can keep would be “the easy answer.”
“The harder answer — but the right one — is to do the work needed to determine what a charter school's actual costs are,” he said. “Some schools would get less and others more, but it would be fair.”
Eller said Gov. Tom Corbett “generally supports” comprehensive reforms for charter schools “as long as they balance the ability to provide quality options for students and ensure that charter schools remain competitive.”
Tony LaRussa is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7987 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.