New GED exam deadline brings about a year-end flood of test takers
General Educational Development exam proctors reported a huge influx of last-minute test takers in December as students rushed to finish the five-part battery before sweeping changes that took effect on Wednesday nullified incomplete scores.
“If you were stuck on a particular subject, this deadline was a gut check,” said Greg Mims, public relations director for the Greater Pittsburgh Literacy Council. “We've had a very busy year.”
Aligned with Common Core standards taught to traditional K-12 students, the new version condenses content from five to four subjects; raises and standardizes test fees; adds short answer and extended response questions; and requires students to demonstrate computer skills by eliminating a pen-and-paper option to take the exam.
The test includes a new scoring level termed “Career and College Ready,” indicating the test taker scored at the highest level and is academically prepared for the workforce and post-secondary education.
Students who failed to pass all five tests by Tuesday now must restart the process in 2014. The base price to take the test is $120.
“Anytime there's a major deadline like this, people hurry to finish up,” said Don Block, the literacy council's executive director. “Many of our students have been working toward this goal for years. They don't want that work to be lost.”
The 2010 Census indicates that more than 39 million adults 16 and older in the United States lack a high school credential, including 710,000 in Pennsylvania, Block said. In the same year, about 757,000 adults took the GED worldwide, according to GED Testing Service LLC in Washington.
In 2012, 20,956 took the GED test in Pennsylvania. Seventy percent passed the exam.
At the council's fifth-floor offices on Monday, hordes of hopeful 20-somethings paced the hallways, awaiting their scores.
Slumped against a pastel wall, Dorian Asque, 23, of Lincoln-Larimer bemoaned his four-year GED journey.
“Don't laugh at me. This is stressful,” he said, tapping a blank phone with a frown. “The test next year will be so hard. I don't want to do this all over again.”
Friends chided him. “You've got this,” one said. “Don't beat yourself up before you know for sure,” said another.
Asque, who passed, and others screamed, danced and wiped each others' tears each time officials announced a passing grade.
“We were all so worried about starting over next year,” said Jonathon Miller, 20, who studied for five months before he earned a passing score. As with Asque, only math held him back.
“It's 7 o'clock on the last night, and we're waiting on a score,” he said. “It's really scary.”
Proctors at Goodwill of Southwestern PA had nearly 120 test takers in December, almost four times the norm, adult education coordinator Danielle Blanchard-Krane said.
“We fast-tracked anyone we thought was ready,” she said, “and started orientation on the 2014 test for anyone who wasn't.”
Many participants had trouble with scheduling a test date, said Judy Martier, Goodwill's director of education assessment and training.
“We called around for a lot of them,” she said. “Some drove to Scranton, Philadelphia, the New York border. They really wanted to get this done.”
The new test emphasizes critical thinking skills over memorization, Blanchard-Krane said.
“So in science, you may have to write up an experiment to prove the hypothesis explained in the test question. Before, you just labeled the parts of a cell with multiple-choice options,” she said. “For some people, this will be a total mental shift.”
Megan Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5815 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.