Share This Page

Alleged members of Uniontown 'Killa Squad' charged with riot

Three Uniontown teenagers, alleged members of a gang called Killa Squad, have been jailed on riot and assault charges over a May 10 fracas on Murray Avenue that ended with several other teens injured, police said.

Three boys, ages 17, 16 and 14, were charged as adults Friday with felony counts of aggravated assault and rioting and misdemeanor charges of simple assault and reckless endangerment before Uniontown District Judge Michael Metros.

Warrants were issued for the arrests of two other suspects who face similar charges, according to city police Detective Donald M. Gmitter.

According to an affidavit of probable cause, police were called to a home at 104 Murray Ave. on a report of 20 people fighting with weapons shortly before 8 p.m.

Police reported three male victims were sitting on the porch when a group of as many as 30 people ran into the yard and onto the porch. At least one person brandished a knife, while two others wielded pipes.

All three of the teens on the porch sustained injuries to their hands and were treated in Uniontown Hospital, the complaint stated.

"Throughout the course of this investigation, I learned that the suspects involved are part of gang called the Killa Squad," Gmitter wrote in the complaint. "They use different means of communication to organize criminal activity, including this attack."

Gmitter said the gang uses a "strength in numbers" tactic to commit acts of violence.

"They have also made threats of violence to their victims not to involve the police after an incident occurs," the complaint stated.

City police said charges could be filed against a total of 12 suspects in the Murray Avenue beatings.

The three teens charged as adults were each being held in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $50,000 bail.

They face preliminary hearings May 25 before Metros.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.