Uniontown man charged, jailed in fatal shooting
A Uniontown man was jailed on criminal homicide charges in connection with the shooting death of a Uniontown man early Sunday in a city housing complex, authorities said.
The suspect, Kurtavius Jermon Smith, 26, was being held in the Fayette County Prison after police charged him with shooting Marlin Crawford, 28, in the head shortly after 4:30 a.m. outside a residence in the Pershing Court housing complex, Uniontown police Chief Jason Cox and a prison spokesman said. Smith was arraigned at Fayette County's booking center, a police spokesman said.
Crawford died at Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown, W.Va., where he had been flown by medical helicopter after first being taken to Uniontown Hospital, police said. A spokesman for the medical examiner for Monongalia County, W.Va., could not be reached for comment yesterday.
Before Smith's arrest, Cox said police were conducting interviews to determine what happened. Police said serveral gunshots were fired outside the housing complex.
Smith had been held in the Fayette County Prison on Jan. 31 on charges of drug possession with intent to deliver, but was released on $26,000 bond on Feb. 7. He was scheduled for a preliminary hearing on those charges before District Judge Michael M. Metros of Uniontown on May 22.
While free on bail, Smith was arrested by Connellsville police on March 25 on charges of marijuana possession. He was scheduled for a preliminary hearing Thursday before Connellsville District Judge Ronald J. Haggerty Jr.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.