Share This Page

LTC Energy needs Fayette residents to OK testing

| Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012, 8:15 a.m.

Over the past few weeks, hundreds of households in the Donegal and Saltick Township areas have received letters from the engineering firm of CME, which is acting on behalf of LTC Energy of Somerset, in requesting that residents allow water testing on their property.

LTC wants to deep mine in an area located between County Line Road and the Pennsylvania Turnpike and also east of Donegal Borough. The testing would become part of the water quality information needed for an application.

The Mountain Watershed Association hosted a public meeting Tuesday to address the mining issues and field questions from concerned residents. About 150 local residents packed the Laurel Highlands Hall in Donegal to listen to a presentation and gather more information on the proposed mining project.

Representatives from LTC and CME were invited but did not attend.

“We don't know how many letters were even sent out,” Beverly Braverman of the Mountain Watershed Association said. “Those that received the letters are within the ‘footprint' of the proposed mine.”

Braverman showed the group a map that was supplied to them that outlined an area of consideration for the mine, but the map does not show the definite outlined area of the mine.

“We haven't yet received an exact map,” Braverman said. “We really don't know what the footprint will look like yet.”

The presentation covered many areas of concern such as water issues, mine subsidence, increased truck traffic and numerous health issues that could possibly occur as a result of the proposed mining.

The group also talked about a processing center that would be necessary to clean the mined coal, with the smallest of possible structures covering many acres.

“The smallest could be a 30- to 50-acre facility, but that is still big.” Braverman said.

LTC already has been granted permission to explore the area.

Those who opt to not have their water tested or their structures inspected prior to any mining may forfeit their rights to then try to receive any compensation from LTC if they experience water problems or structural issues after the mining begins.

“The inspections can be very intrusive, but if you don't do it and you have damage, they will then say that they didn't cause it,” Braverman said.

A large portion of the proposed site's coal rights are owned by the Loyalhanna Watershed Association, which has already informed LTC that it will not allow mining.

Braverman questioned the location of the proposed site, which is a popular tourist area.

“You have to ask why they would even want to put a mine in an area like this,” Braverman said.

The company has not yet submitted a pre-application or application to the DEP.

“It's all still in the exploration and research phase,” Braverman said. “It's really hard to do anything until they submit an application.”

Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.