Share This Page

Dawson man charged with rape

| Friday, Dec. 7, 2012, 12:02 a.m.

A Dawson man is behind bars after he allegedly had a sexual relationship with a 14-year-old girl in the span of two years.

David Lewis Stewart, 48, of 210 Griscom St. was charged with five counts each of rape, forcible compulsion, unlawful contact with a minor and sexual assault; three counts each of aggravated indecent assault and indecent assault and one count of corruption of a minor at District Judge Dwight Shaner's office on Wednesday.

State police at Belle Vernon reported that between Jan. 31, 2010 and Oct. 13, 2012, Stewart had multiple sexual encounters with a girl who was 14 years old at the time. Police said he would use force to overcome her resistance and touched, kissed and fondled parts of her body.

According to an affidavit of probable cause, Stewart had sexual intercourse with the girl between four and six times when she was 16 years of age without her consent and would use force to overcome her.

Stewart was lodged in the Fayette County Prison with bail set at $100,000.

A preliminary hearing has been scheduled at 1:30 p.m. Dec. 11 at Shaner's office.

Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or mhofmann@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.