2 charged in Wharton robbery
Criminal charges have been filed against two Fayette County men who police said brandished a rifle while attempting to rob a Charleroi man as he walked on Five Forks Road in Wharton on Sunday.
Robert Charles Wingrove III, 22, of Dunbar was arraigned Monday on charges of robbery, criminal conspiracy and simple assault and placed in the Fayette County jail in lieu of $50,000 bond.
A second suspect, Joseph Robert Basista, 24, of Perryopolis is wanted on the same charges.
In a criminal complaint, state police at Uniontown said the Charleroi man had an argument with his girlfriend, then went walking on Five Forks Road at 12:30 a.m. Sunday, when a female passenger in a two-door car asked whether he needed a ride.
He declined and the car pulled away, but it slowed to a crawl until he caught up with it, according to the criminal complaint. Wingrove, holding a rifle, and Basista exited and “demanded everything in his pockets,” police said.
A scuffle ensued, but Wingrove and Basista were scared off when the victim's girlfriend approached on foot on Five Forks Road and yelled at them, police said in the complaint.
Wingrove and Basista fled in the car, according to the complaint, but the victim later identified them in a photo lineup.
Police said the victim was struck several times in the face during the scuffle and suffered a cut over his right eye.
Wingrove was arraigned before on-call District Judge Randy Abraham of Masontown and placed in the county jail in lieu of $50,000 bond.
Basista is wanted on an arrest warrant.
Wingrove faces a preliminary hearing before North Union District Judge Wendy Dennis.
Liz Zemba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.