Share This Page

Search for man missing in park to focus on river

| Monday, Jan. 7, 2013, 12:02 a.m.

A search for a Somerset man missing from Ohiopyle State Park will resume on Monday with efforts focusing on the Youghiogheny River between Ohiopyle and Connellsville, a park official said on Sunday.

Search and rescue teams looking for Jeremy Walker, 29, who was reported missing on Jan. 2, conducted a ground and water search on Sunday. The teams have searched about 50 percent of the area within seventh-tenths of a mile of where his car was found in Ohiopyle, said Stacie Hall, assistant manager of the 20,500-acre state park in Fayette County.

Volunteers, dog teams, water and swift-water rescue squads returned at daylight on Sunday to continue the search until dark, Hall said.

“We have about the same number of searchers — 69 — as we did on Saturday,” Hall said.

They regrouped on Sunday night and made plans for search efforts on Monday.

“We never call off a search,” Hall said.

Park officials have said that Walker is known to have previously visited the park.

Search teams are reviewing his travel plans and taking into consideration his age, physical condition and activity history to best determine likely areas of the park where he might be found, Hall has said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.