Fayette inmate gets up to 4 years for sending threatening letters
A Fayette County man who sent letters from prison threatening to blow up the courthouse and kill a crime victim, a judge and the district attorney was sentenced to up to four years in prison.
As part of a plea bargain, Robert Ray Shaner, 34, formerly of Mt. Braddock, on Monday entered guilty pleas to four counts of harassment by communication, said his attorney, Dianne Zerega of Uniontown.
Senior Judge William Ober sentenced Shaner to 16 to 48 months in prison, Zerega said, as per terms of the plea bargain.
Shaner, who already is serving up to 20 years in prison for attempted rape, was charged in 2011 with four counts of harassment. In a criminal complaint, Trooper James Pierce said Shaner was an inmate at State Correctional Institution-Retreat in Hunlock Creek, Luzerne County, when he allegedly mailed the threatening letters to then-Judge Ralph Warman and District Attorney Jack Heneks.
Warman in 1998 sentenced Shaner to six to 20 years in prison after Shaner pleaded guilty to attempted rape, attempted involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, robbery and unlawful restraint.
The first threatening letter, postmarked Aug. 22, was sent to Warman. Shaner threatened to tie up the judge, cut him, hold his family hostage and set their house on fire, the complaint said.
Shaner indicated that upon his parole, he planned to blow up the Fayette courthouse and the state police barracks near Uniontown because he “wants to kill everyone who made him suffer for all the years he‘s been incarcerated,” according to the complaint.
The second letter was sent to Heneks at his courthouse office. In it, Shaner threatened to “kill everyone in the D.A.'s office” and the victim by “cutting her throat and kill(ing) her family by setting them on fire.”
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.