S. Connellsville adds light-duty option for municipal workers
With hopes of saving money in the long run when it comes to workers' compensation, South Connellsville Borough voted to have a light-duty option for its worker's insurance plan.
Councilman James Swink informed members this week that the annual rate for workers' compensation has doubled in the last two years — from $20,000 to $40,000.
To help prevent that cost from rising in the next few years, Swink said the insurance company suggested council establish a light-duty policy where workers can still return to their jobs, but will have restrictions in place.
“They can still technically work manual labor,” said borough solicitor Mark Rowan, but must not violate the restrictions the policy has in place, he added.
Council unanimously voted to put the light-duty policy into its insurance policy.
In other business, council:
• Voted to provide $350 to the police department to purchase a digital camera since the current camera is out of date.
• Voted to appoint Mayor Peter Casini and David Holbrook representatives to the municipal authority.
• Instructed Councilwoman Karen Holbrook to send a code violation warning letter to a resident that has an accumulation of garbage on their property, causing damage to a neighbor's fence. If the resident fails to obey the letter, either the police or the council president can take the matter to District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.