Share This Page

Dunbar Township sewage project progresses

| Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2013, 12:02 a.m.

Ken Martray with Widmer Engineering updated Dunbar Township Sewage Authority members this week on Phase II of the current project under way off Route 119.

D&M Contracting of New Alexandria has finished all the line work, including the addition going to Duke's bar, he said. Testing on the lines should begin next month.

Martray added that the plant is up and running for the new basin and two generators have been set — one at Morrell and one at Wheeler.

He said the generator planned for Oglevee Lane was delayed because of unexpected hard rock in the area and very tight spacing in which to work.

Martray said that when Phase II is complete, the project should come in about $40,000 under budget. He is hoping to use those funds to update the interceptor line between Ridge Boulevard and Adelaide.

Authority board member Dwaine Gordon asked Martray why there was nothing in the plans to bring sewage to Wheeler Bottom.

Martray said that would be a big expense for just one house, which was hard to justify.

“They can put in a grinder pump system to pump up to our system,” he said.

As for Phase III, which would bring sewage to the Monarch area, funding has not yet been approved.

Martray told board members the Department of Agriculture's Rural Development is asking for more information, including updated costs and an environmental study.

“They want a study done and an estimate of what it would cost to have a grinder pump system for each house rather than gravity flow, so they have a comparative cost,” he said.

Authority board Chairman John Malone said this project (Phase II) has moved along much quicker and “without as many headaches” as Phase I.

Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.