Fayette treasury worker hoping to lead office
Nancy Wilson, candidate for Fayette County treasurer
A longtime employee of the Fayette County Treasurer's Office has announced her candidacy to head that office.
Nancy Lee Wilson of Uniontown is seeking the Democratic nomination for treasurer to replace Robert Danko, who will retire at the end of the year.
Wilson, who has worked in the office for 33 years, serves as second deputy treasurer.
“I feel that I'm best qualified for the position since I've worked here in this office for as long as I have,” Wilson said. “And Mr. Danko has run the office so smoothly over all the years, I'd like to keep that relationship with the customers who are being waited on.”
Wilson said the office is known for issuing dog, hunting and fishing licenses, but it has numerous other responsibilities.
“Many may not know the office of treasurer is responsible for managing over $10 million of taxpayers' money on a yearly basis,” Wilson said in a news release.
Her duties include overseeing real estate tax mailings and collections for Connellsville, Uniontown and Ohiopyle and training new employees. She reconciles bank accounts, handles bookkeeping for licensing and tax accounts and maintains files and reports used to prepare state and county audits.
Wilson said she has helped the office through a number of changes that made it more efficient. If elected, she said she will continue to implement “office processes and automation” with the present staff to cut costs and improve efficiency.
“They are a dedicated and hardworking crew who are respectful of one another and the public,” Wilson said in the release.
She is a graduate of Uniontown Area High School and attended Penn State Fayette and California University of Pennsylvania.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 .
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.