Auditor in Fayette Controller's office running for treasurer
An auditor who works for the Fayette County Controller's office is running for county treasurer.
Michael Zimcosky of Smock will seek the Democratic nomination. Incumbent Robert Danko is retiring.
“With Mr. Danko announcing his retirement, I felt it was a good opportunity to use my education and county work experience to benefit the people of Fayette County,” Zimcosky said.
As an internal auditor, Zimcosky said he has performed more than 85 audits of county offices, including tax collectors, magisterial district judges and row officers. His audits helped to uncover “fiscal mismanagement” at the jail, he said, and resulted in recovering nearly $180,000 from the tax claim bureau for the county's general fund.
“My experience working as an accountant and internal auditor has prepared me to handle the challenges that await in the Treasurer's Office,” Zimcosky said in a news release.
“I have a proven track record as a hard-working, dedicated and unbiased internal auditor ... .”
If elected, he said, he will build on Danko's work while implementing initiatives to improve customer service and efficiency.
He said he will fully utilize available technology, including the recent purchase of accounting software.
“One of the goals would be to look at that system and seek ways to use it to make life easier and more convenient for anyone who has dealings with the treasurer's office,” Zimcosky said.
He said he will “ensure hands-on financial management.”
A lifelong Fayette resident, Zimcosky is a graduate of Uniontown High School, California University of Pennsylvania and St. Vincent College.
He holds a bachelor's in business administration with an emphasis in finance and a master of divinity degree.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.