Prosecutor to run for Fayette judge
Douglas Sepic says he has the experience and temperament needed to serve as a Fayette County judge.
Sepic, 45, a Democrat, will cross-file to seek the nomination of both major parties in the May 21 primary.
He seeks to fill a vacancy created with the retirements of Senior Judges Ralph Warman and Gerald Solomon.
“In terms of experience, I've been involved in just about every type of case imaginable that a judge would see,” Sepic said Friday.
He has served as an assistant district attorney — on and off, since 1994 — working for each of last four county prosecutors.
During his career, Sepic said, he has prosecuted more than 8,000 criminal cases, including more than 250 jury and 450 non-jury trials, eight murder trials and 45 drug-trafficking cases.
County judges devote at least half of their time to criminal cases, he noted.
Sepic is a partner in the Dunbar Township law firm of Watson Mundorff Brooks & Sepic. He is a 1992 graduate of Duquesne University School of Law with honors and a 1989 graduate of West Virginia University with a degree in finance. He has practiced law for more than 20 years.
In private practice, Sepic has been involved in hundreds of custody, divorce and domestic relations cases and handled personal injury, zoning and gas/mineral-rights matters.
He is encouraged by other lawyers, law enforcement and friends to run, Sepic said.
“It seemed like the next logical step for me in terms of trying to help the people of Fayette County, having been in the district attorney's office for so long and with other work I've done,” Sepic said.
He and his wife, Michelle, and their three children live in South Union.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.