Aerial mapping for Bullskin sewer project completed
Aerial mapping for Phase II of a project conducted by the Bullskin Township/Connellsville Township Joint Sewer Authority has been completed, and half of the digitizing has been done, Glenn Wolfe of Widmer Engineering told authority board members this week.
In August, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced project funding of more than $5.3 million in combined loan and grant money for the authority to complete Phase II of bringing public sewage to 265 more homes in Bullskin Township.
The authority received a $2.8 million water and environmental loan and $2,552,000 in water and environmental grant money, both through USDA Rural Development.
The authority will have to contribute $318,000 for the project, which will include laying sanitary sewer lines and bringing sewer service to parts of Johnson Lane, Dryhill Road, East End Road, Skate Lane/Longanecker Road and Richey Road.
Wolfe said in August that it probably would take at least 2 1⁄2 years for the project's completion.
“Normally it takes a year to design, six months for the permitting and a year to construct, so we're looking at about 2 1⁄2 years, but if we can move it along faster, we certainly will,” he said.
This week Wolfe said letters were sent to future customers within the Phase II project stating that some outside inspections may take place soon to get information for the project's design.
The Garden Street project is now completed, and tap letters have been sent. Wolfe said the next item the authority will have to handle will be tap inspections.
The blockages caused by tree roots on the Merit Manor project have been cleared.
Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.