Police: Woman torches car, punches boyfriend
A Connellsville woman allegedly set fire to a car in front of her boyfriend's home and punched him in the face after an argument.
Kaitlyn Mckenzie Dewitt, 22, of 2119 Second St. was charged with reckless burning or exploding and two counts of criminal mischief and harassment at District Judge Ronald Haggerty Jr.'s office.
According to an affidavit of probable cause, Dewitt was at the Willow Room with her boyfriend, Michael Allen Nicklow when the two became involved in an argument.
The couple left the Willow Inn around 10:30 p.m. and went to Nicklow's residence in Bullskin, where they continued to argue and Nicklow told Dewitt to leave.
He told police he took her to the Bullskin Sheetz, dropped her off and told her to contact her parents. He returned home.
According to police, about 2 a.m., Dewitt returned to Nicklow's and started banging on the door, telling Nicklow she wanted her son.
Dewitt allegedly told Nicklow if he didn't let her in, she would burn the house down. She then punched Nicklow in the face and grabbed the glasses off his face and broke them; he closed the door.
A relative in the Nicklow house then noticed a Honda, owned by Lorie Ann Kuhns, was on fire. He went out to try to extinguish the blaze and saw Dewitt standing in the yard.
Dewitt allegedly said, “You would not let me in the house, and I had to stay warm” and then left the scene.
Bullskin Township VFD was called to the scene.
Dewitt will have a preliminary hearing at 8:45 a.m. Thursday at Haggerty's office.
She was lodged in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $5,000.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-626-3539 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.