'Vulgar' video gets 13 Brownsville students suspended
Thirteen students from Brownsville Area High School were suspended Tuesday after a video the school board president called “very graphic and very vulgar” was shot in a classroom during school and posted in the Internet.
Brownsville School Board president Roy Brashear said the board was made aware of the incident at Tuesday night's planning session. He said the board supported the decision by superintendent Dr. Philip J. Savini to suspend the students.
“Our superintendent made a decision to suspend the students who were responsible, and we stand behind his decision,” Brashear said.
The 27-second video shows the students doing their interpretation of the “Harlem Shake,” a dance fad that has grown rapidly while making its way around the Internet. The video was shot Monday, said Brashear, who has served on the board for 17 years, 10 years as president.
One parent told the Tribune-Review Tuesday night that her 15-year-old daughter shot the video and was suspended.
The parent said the two-day suspensions were given at the direction of the school principal.
The parent characterized the video — which at times shows students making sexually suggestive gestures — as “very inappropriate,” but she maintains the incident warrants in-school suspensions rather than tossing the students out of school.
Out-of-school suspensions, she said, carry further consequences for her daughter and the other students.
Uniontown attorney Jim Davis, solicitor for the school district, said the district has no further comment on the matter.
Chuck Brittain is a freelance writer
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.