Banning Road residents reminded to pay monthly water bills
Perry Township supervisors directed solicitor Don McCue this week to write letters to Banning Road residents, reminding them that they are required to pay monthly water bills.
Chairman A.J. Boni said the township recently extended water pipelines to several homes in the Banning Road area.
Although the residents paid the tap-in and sewer line fees, Boni said, they have not been paying monthly water bills.
“We have a debt service for this project, and the township needs to pay back the money,” Boni said. “Our water bills are already $50 a month. If these residents don't pay their water bills, we're going to have to raise the water bills for everyone in the township.”
Florence and Harold Prah, who own two houses at 1661 and 1651 Banning Road, told supervisors that they continue to encounter sewage problems.
Florence Prah told supervisors that she called the township building on Feb. 27 to report water coming into the basement of the farmhouse the couple had previously rented.
“The contractor was supposed to take care of the problem,” said township Supervisor Clarence Johnson.
Prah said the issue has not been resolved, and the entire area has been full of ice.
Boni explained the township supervisors really cannot resolve the issue, which needs to be handled by the sewer authority.
In other action, the supervisors approved a motion to proceed with the bidding process for the 2013 projects. They include paving in Whitsett on Main, Pilgrim, First, Second, Third and Fourth streets. If possible, the supervisors plan to try to micro-seal Memorial Drive in Star Junction.
The supervisors announced that spring cleanup in the township is scheduled for April 9.
Cindy Ekas is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.