Share This Page

Fayette official seeks treasurer post

| Friday, March 8, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Melvin Lerch, candidate for Fayette County treasurer

A Franklin Township supervisor is running for Fayette County treasurer.

Melvin E. Lerch Jr. is seeking the Democratic nomination for the four-year elected post.

The office is open because the incumbent, Robert Danko, will retire when his term expires in December.

Lerch said he first had an interest in the office 24 years ago, but he opted not to run because his friend, Danko, was a candidate.

“I was a township supervisor and I decided to stay there,” Lerch said. “I did not think that Bob would stay more than one or two terms.”

An outdoorsman, Lerch said he has an interest in the office because of its role issuing hunting and fishing licenses.

Lerch has been a Franklin supervisor for 29 years. He said he feels that he can transfer some of his experience running a township to running a county office.

If elected, Lerch, 59, said he has no immediate plans for changes to the office because “it runs efficiently now.” He said he likely would visit treasurers' offices in neighboring counties to determine whether any of their practices would prove beneficial in Fayette.

“I would study it out and visit other offices to see if we can pick up any pointers,” Lerch said.

Lerch is a graduate of Uniontown High School.

The father of two sons, he is a member of Juniata Sportsman's Club and Star Junction Fish and Game Club.

Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or lzemba@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.