Former state Rep. Lawrence "Larry" Roberts to run for Fayette County treasurer
A former state legislator is running for Fayette County treasurer.
Lawrence “Larry” Roberts, 71, of South Union is seeking the Democratic nomination for the four-year post. The position is open because the incumbent, Robert Danko, is retiring in December.
“It's something I've wanted to do for a long time, but I would never have run against Bob Danko,” Roberts said. “I'm hoping I can do as good a job as he did.”
Roberts is a retired state legislator. He served 14 years as the Democratic representative in the 51st District. Roberts is self-employed as a labor arbitrator.
Roberts wants to bring his financial experience in the state House of Representatives to the county treasurer's office.
“It is my firm belief that the treasurer needs to be someone with financial responsibility, which I will provide,” Roberts said in a statement. “In that regard, I served on the economic development committee as the subcommittee chairman for banking for 14 years.”
In addition, Roberts said he was on the board of directors of a “large federal credit union” and has “an excellent credit record.”
A disabled veteran with 22 years of active duty military service, Roberts has a master's degree in business. He is a graduate of Uniontown High School and holds lifetime memberships with the Hutchison Sportsmens Club, VFW, American Legion, AMVETS, DAV and several other military organizations.
Other memberships include the Uniontown Sons of Italy, Uniontown AF&AM 651 and Jednota.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.