Upper Tyrone municipal building could soon get new restroom facilities
Upper Tyrone Township supervisors are hoping to have new restroom facilities soon at the municipal building.
Five bids received for the project were opened and read aloud this week.
With a bid of $15,130, Roger Suter & Sons of Connellsville submitted the lowest bid. Next lowest bid was $15,300 by Vince Building Company of Greensburg.
Supervisors voted to refer the bids to Widmer Engineering, which will review them for grant compliance responsibilities required by the Department of Community and Economic Development.
Once supervisors receive a recommendation from Widmer, they will advertise a special meeting with intent to award the bid.
In other business, Supervisor Bill Edwards said the township is down one auditor and has not received any letters of interest in regards to the position.
Motions passed included hosting the Fayette County Association of Township Officials monthly meeting, renewing the Sam's Club membership, entering into a salt participation agreement for road salt with the state's Department of General Services for the 2013-14 winter season and to purchase a new computer for supervisors' use in the amount not to exceed $1,000, which has been budgeted.
Supervisors rescinded a motion made in January that appointed Morris Knowles and Associates as primary sewage enforcement officer and Robert Killinger as secondary officer. A new motion was made to appoint K2 Engineering Firm as primary sewage enforcement officer and Morris Knowles as secondary sewage enforcement officer.
Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.