Fayette landfill owner must approve fee
Fayette County will have to convince the owner of the only landfill within its borders to voluntarily pay a fee to officials, according to a state Department of Environmental Protection employee who met with county representatives this week.
Sharon Svitek, recycling and planning coordinator, said counties cannot assess a host-municipality fee unless the landfill operator agrees to it.
Svitek spoke during a meeting to discuss possible revisions to the county's solid waste management plan.
“You can negotiate a fee, but you can't make it a condition,” Svitek told local officials.
In addition, Svitek said counties cannot license waste haulers or charge them registration fees.
The county's 2013 budget includes anticipated revenues of $156,890 from solid-waste landfill fees.
Al Ambrosini, the only commissioner who attended the meeting, said commissioners will have to try to sell the idea of a county-imposed fee on landfills.
“We'll have to strategize on how innovative we can be,” Ambrosini said. “We'll have to turn into remarkable salesmen.”
Svitek said other counties have successfully negotiated fees with their landfills.
For example, she said Allegheny County receives 25 cents per ton of refuse dumped in its landfills.
Advanced Disposal Services, formerly Veolia, is the only landfill in Fayette County, according to information contained on the DEP's website. It is located in German Township.
Dean Mori, site manager for the Fayette landfill, was unavailable for comment on Thursday.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or firstname.lastname@example.org
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.