Line springs leak in Indian Head
About a dozen customers were without water early Thursday morning after a ductile iron pipeline within the Indian Creek Valley Water Authority's system sprung a corrosion leak.
Kerry Witt, manager of the authority, said it was the main line along Indian Head Road between Route 711 and the Millertown area where customers were affected.
“There were maybe 10 to 15 customers — maybe as high as 20 — that had lower pressure service this morning, but we tried to minimize the issue,” he said. “The leak started about 4 or 5 this morning, but by the time we got to it and started managing the lines, it probably caused problems when people were getting cleaned up to go to work.”
Witt added that they were on top of the issue pretty fast so didn't lose much water at all, but the system is getting old, and there have been several leaks in the last few years.
“The leaks have begun to tax the system a little, so we're trying to button it up the best way we can,” he said. “We've been doing some nighttime work looking for leaks because it's much easier to check for leaks when we can have low pressure in the line.”
The authority has more than 130 lines in its system, so maintaining them and finding and fixing any potential problems before they happen can be challenging.
Shortly before 1 p.m. Witt said they were very close to having the issue corrected.
Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.