Connellsville councilman says future of advisory board uncertain
Connellsville City Councilman Greg (Matty) Ritch said he is not sure what the future holds for the advisory board of the Connellsville Community Center.
But, he said, things are still moving forward at the center, located on Fairview Avenue.
The advisory board was appointed by city council several months. During that last several months, several members of the eight-member board resigned. At the end of February there were four members remaining. At a meeting in February, those four members agreed to suspend any advisory board action until further notice.
In March, Gary Colatch, acting chairman of the advisory board, said the board members didn't feel like they had any reason to continue after they were informed that a new revitalization committee of volunteers had been formed to be involved in community center interests.
Recently, Colatch confirmed there is nothing going on from an advisory board standpoint at this point.
“I don't think the members that are left want to come back right now,” Colatch said. “I haven't heard from Mayor (Charles) Matthews or Matty (Councilman) Ritch. So as far as I know, they are happily moving on with the volunteer group they put together.”
Colatch said he is waiting to see what happens in the upcoming municipal election. He believes other advisory board members are also following the race for council and mayor.
Ritch said as far as he knows the advisory board's self suspension is still ongoing.
“Our volunteer group is here and working every day,” Ritch said. He said the volunteer base continues to grow.
“I'm real pleased with the progress we're making here,” Ritch said. “One focus — one direction.”
“Things are on a very good pace,” Ritch said. “We continue to see improvement and involvement from dedicated individuals in this community.”
Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.