Connellsville man arrested, charged with robbing Springfield bank
A Fayette County man was jailed Thursday, charged with robbing a Springfield bank.
James Anthony Shroyer, 51, of Connellsville also drew charges of aggravated assault for allegedly ramming a police vehicle in a failed escape attempt.
Shroyer stole a car in Connellsville from Jesse Powell at 1:06 p.m. Thursday, state police said.
Shroyer allegedly drove Powell's green Chevrolet Cavalier to the First National Bank at 2066 Indian Head Road and entered the building, concealing his face.
Shroyer concealed something in his hand, pointed it at a female teller and demanded money, police said.
After being handed an undisclosed amount of cash, Shroyer dropped the money bag as he ran to the vehicle, police said.
A bank employee who was outside at the time provided police with the vehicle's license plate number.
Troopers spotting the car southbound on Route 711 began a pursuit, traveling on several dirt roads before Shroyer reportedly rammed a police car and crashed.
Shroyer was transported to the Uniontown state police barracks where, police say, he confessed to stealing the car and robbing the bank.
Additional charges include simple assault, theft, criminal mischief, receiving stolen property, fleeing and eluding and driving while under suspension.
Shroyer was arraigned before District Judge Mike Defino and placed in the Fayette County Prison in lieu of $150,000 bail.
He is scheduled for a preliminary hearing before Defino on Thursday.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.