Fayette, Westmoreland communities finalize plans for 2013 G-7
Local municipal leader gathered on Wednesday to make final arrangements for the G7, which will be held April 18 through 20 at the Laurelville Mennonite Church Center.
The purpose of the summit is to allow the municipalities to come together and discuss issues, concerns and share ideas.
Participating this year are Connellsville, Mt. Pleasant, Scottdale, Everson, South Connellsville, Youngwood and New Stanton.
“At this point, we have just about everything taken care of,” said Jeff Landy, Mt. Pleasant borough manager and event founder.
This is the fourth year for the summit.
“It would be great if we could find a few more sponsors for this. Our goal has always been to find enough sponsors so that this year, each town will be hosting different topics,” Landy said.
South Connellsville will be hosting the public works and street department segment; Everson, intermunicipal agreements; Scottdale, tax assessment and appeals; Mt. Pleasant, crime control and relationships with the state police; Youngwood, recycling and environmental protection and legislative initiatives; New Stanton, mayor and council and council responsibilities and liabilities; and Connellsville, Marcellus shale and pensions.
With Youngwood and New Stanton joining the event this year, organizers are hoping there will be more interest and larger attendance.
“We averaged about 10 to 15 last year, so I think that we can safely say we can expect 15 to 20 this year,” Landy said.
Connellsville Organizers are looking for sponsors who will be featured on banners and in the program.
Anyone interested in becoming a sponsor for the event can contact Landy at 724-547-6745.
Marilyn Forbes is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.