2 of 3 challenges nixed for Fayette office hopeful
A Fayette County man has lost the second of three challenges he filed seeking to eliminate his competition for an elected office by invalidating nominating petitions.
Robert “Ted” Pritchard of Fairchance is one of four candidates seeking the Democratic nomination for prothonotary. He has asked the courts to strike the nominating petitions of the three other candidates — Pamela Hudson, Paul Shipley and Nina Capuzzi Frankhouser.
Pritchard alleged the other candidates' nominating petitions contained various errors and omissions, or had illegible names and signatures.
In addition, he wanted the Election Bureau to compare all of the names to voter registrations to ensure the signers were registered.
On Tuesday, Senior Judge Gerald Solomon denied Pritchard's motion against Shipley as untimely. Pritchard missed the deadline to file the challenge, Solomon said in a four-page opinion and order.
The deadline to challenge, Solomon indicated, was seven days after the March 12 filing deadline for the nominating petitions.
Pritchard presented the challenge to the prothonotary's office within that time frame, but he failed to pay an $86 filing fee until April 1, which was past the deadline.
Solomon said state law indicates that the prothonotary is not to docket a “any suit or action or order of court … until the requisite fee is paid.”
Solomon had earlier denied Pritchard's request to allow him to proceed in pauperis, or “as a pauper,” until he had the money for the filing fees.
On Monday, Judge Steve Leskinen denied Pritchard's challenge against Frankhouser, but Pritchard has filed an appeal with Commonwealth Court.
President Judge John F. Wagner Jr. held a hearing on Hudson's petition on Monday, but he has not yet issued a ruling.
Liz Zemba is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-601-2166 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Man charged with sexual assaults on girl
- 2nd defendant to enter plea in Connellsville homicide
- Connellsville father to plead guilty in stabbing
- Barn fire no obstacle to opening of farm store near Dawson
- Former Masontown police officer wants gun charges thrown out
- 4 projects suggested for block grant funding in Connellsville
- Winery proposed for dry Saltlick