Trump Run Project finished
The Trump Run Project that included the relocation of a bridge along South Pittsburgh Street that divides Connellsville and South Connellsville has been completed.
The Connellsville Municipal Authority agreed Tuesday night to pay Danmar Contracting Inc. of Delmont a total of $42,085, including a $1,680 change order, to pay for the relocation of a sewage line that ran underneath the bridge.
John Tomaro, engineer for Widmer Engineering, explained that the authority was required to pay the total cost of the project but will receive reimbursement from PennDOT for 50 percent of the cost.
“The project actually cost less money than we originally anticipated,” Tomaro said.
Tomaro explained that PennDOT will also be required to pay 50 percent of other costs associated with the project, including engineering costs, solicitor's fees and other related expenses.
Tomaro said the authority has not calculated the additional expenses, however.
In other business, the authority made its final payment of $8,858.74 for its PennVEST loan.
The authority received a $1.8 million loan through PennVEST to pay for the separation of sanitary and storm sewers in five sections of the city.
The project was completed last year. The authority's payment on the project will remain unchanged.
Jerry Fox, the authority's superintendent, said he received one complaint last month from a homeowner located at 147 S. Ninth St.
When Fox reported to investigate the complaint, he discovered the house has never been connected to the city sewer line.
“The sewer line was replaced in 1997, but somehow the house was never connected to the system,” Fox said.
The homeowner agreed to pay RDM of Pittsburgh $3,600 to tap into the sewage system and complete the job.
“We had no postings or shutoff notices last month,” he said.
Cindy Ekas is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.